Recent Legal History of the Death Penalty in America

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the government-sanctioned execution of a person sentenced to death by a court of law as punishment for a crime. Crimes that can be punished by the death penalty are known as capital crimes and include serious offenses such as murder, aggravated rape, child rape, child sexual abuse, terrorism, treason, espionage, sedition, piracy, aircraft hijacking, drug trafficking and drug dealing, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Currently, 56 countries, including the United States allow their courts to impose the death penalty, while 106 countries have enacted laws abolishing it completely. Eight countries sanction the death penalty in special circumstances such as war crimes, and 28 countries have abolished it in practice. As in the United States, the death penalty is a matter of controversy. The United Nations has now adopted five non-binding resolutions calling for a global moratorium on the death penalty, calling for its eventual abolition worldwide. While most countries have abolished it, over 60% of the world’s population live countries where the death penalty is allowed. China is believed to execute more people than all other countries combined. The Death Penalty in the United States While the death penalty has been an integral part of the American judicial system since the colonial period, when a person could be executed for offenses like witchcraft or stealing grapes, the modern history of American execution has been shaped largely by political reaction to public opinion. Between 1977 and 2017—the latest year available in U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics data—34 states executed 1,462 people. The Texas state criminal correctional system accounts for 37% of all executions. Voluntary Moratorium: 1967-1972 While all but 10 states allowed the death penalty in the late 1960s, and an average of 130 executions per year were being carried out, public opinion turned sharply against the death penalty. Several other nations had dropped the death penalty by the early 1960s and legal authorities in the U.S. were starting to question whether or not executions represented cruel and unusual punishments under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Public support for the death penalty reached its lowest point in 1966, when a Gallup poll showed only 42% of Americans approved of the practice. Between 1967 and 1972, the U.S. observed what amounted to a voluntary moratorium on executions as the U.S. Supreme Court wrestled with the issue. In several cases not directly testing its constitutionality, the Supreme Court modified the application and administration of the death penalty. The most significant of these cases dealt with juries in capital cases. In a 1971 case, the Supreme Court upheld the unrestricted right of juries to both determine guilt or innocence of the accused and to impose the death penalty in a single trial. Supreme Court Overturns Most Death Penalty Laws In the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision effectively striking down most federal and state death penalty laws finding them arbitrary and capricious. The court held that the death penalty laws, as written, violated the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eighth Amendment and the due process guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment. As a result of Furman v. Georgia, more than 600 prisoners who had been sentenced to death between 1967 and 1972 had their death sentences commuted.   Supreme Court Upholds New Death Penalty Laws The Supreme Courts decision in Furman v. Georgia did not rule the death penalty itself to be unconstitutional, only the specific laws by which it was applied. Thus, the states quickly began to write new death penalty laws designed to comply with the courts ruling. The first of the new death penalty laws created by the states of Texas, Florida and Georgia gave the courts wider discretion in applying the death penalty for specific crimes and provided for the current bifurcated trial system, in which a first trial determines guilt or innocence and a second trial determines punishment. The Texas and Georgia laws allowed the jury to decide punishment, while Floridas law left the punishment up to the trial judge. In five related cases, the Supreme Court upheld various aspects of the new death penalty laws. These cases were: Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976)Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976)Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976)Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (1976) As a result of these decisions, 21 states threw out their old mandatory death penalty laws and hundreds of death row prisoners had their sentences changed to life in prison. Execution Resumes On January 17, 1977, convicted murderer Gary Gilmore told a Utah firing squad, Lets do it! and became the first prisoner since 1976 executed under the new death penalty laws. A total of 85 prisoners - 83 men and two women - in 14 U.S. states were executed during 2000. Current Status of the Death Penalty As of January 1, 2015, the death penalty was legal in 31 states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have abolished the death penalty: Alaska, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Between the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976 and 2015, executions have been carried out in thirty-four states. From 1997 to 2014, Texas led all death penalty-legal states, carrying out a total of 518 executions, far ahead of Oklahoma’s 111, Virginia’s 110, and Florida’s 89. Detailed statistics on executions and capital punishment can be found on the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ Capital Punishment website.

East of Eden The Nature of Human Choice - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1735 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/08/15 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: East of Eden Essay Did you like this example? Circumstances can only shape a persons life to the extent that they allow them to. The truth is that peoples lives are determined by their choices not their circumstances. This is not to say that circumstances like a tragedy that occurs in ones life does not play a role in shaping an individual. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "East of Eden: The Nature of Human Choice" essay for you Create order However, an individual always has the ability to choose their response, despite not being able to choose their circumstances. The power of choice produces lessons and values that form peoples overall characteristics. Over time, people realize that who they become is not determined by outside sources, but instead dependent on their responses to the outside influences they face. A simple example comes from a set of children being raised under similar conditions, yet they develop different types of characteristics due to the different life choices they make. Larger scale examples can be found in the texts used in this analysis. Texts used to further dive into this analysis are the Bible and East of Eden by John Steinbeck. The main topics being discussed in this paper address mans nature versus mans nurture, and how nature plays a more significant role in a character being good or evil. These topics ultimately aim to show how mans nature of choice develops an individuals character more than the amount of nurture they receive during their life time. First is an overview at how the nature compares to the nurture of an individual. Next is an explanation of how free will is given to man by God and how the power free will is determined by choosing good or evil. Lastly, the focus shifts to how mans pursuit of good or evil choices shapes the individuals character. This break down highlights how every human being has the same nature, which includes choice and good and evil. Man can choose good or evil, because he has the power to pursue the life he wants. An individuals character is dependent on mans nature of free will, which is man being able to choose good or evil more than people or circumstances that may play a role in his nurture. The significance of a short introduction into both books is important as it shows the idea of human choice and good and evil. The Bible gives some of the very first accounts of God presenting man with having to make choices for himself. Looking at the story of Cain and Abel, found in the book of Genesis, each brother develops a character based on the choices they make. Cain and Abel are known for having a long-standing testimony of brother rivalry, focused on the idea of human free will. When God asked these men to bring forth the best of what they had to offer, Abel follows the instructions given to him by God and automatically wins favor with him. Abel gives what is asked of him to God gaining Gods favor; The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, but on Cain and his offering he did not look (NRSV, Genesis. 4:4). God favors Abel because he gave what he had and more. Cain only gave half of what he had to God, causing God to look past Cain for not being true to his request. This irritates Cain for he does not understand (NRSV, Genesis.4:7). Cain grows jealous of his brother Abel because he holds a stronger relationship with God. An anger inside Cain grows and he develops a solution to the problem by killing his brother Abel; Listen! Your brothers blood cries out to me from the ground (NRSV, Genesis. 4:10). In East of Eden, Steinbeck devotes much of the plot to the exploration and championing of human nature. For in East of Eden also has a family of two generations, the Trask family, and its ultimate triumph is about overcoming the forces of evil. The two brothers, Adam and Charles, have a jealous relationship fraught with tension and violence. Charles envies his brother Adam because he feels that their father Cyrus treats him with preference. The second generation of Trask boys Cal and Aron struggle will similar issues. Steinbeck mostly examines how the nature of man is developed through the concept of Timshel. The novel is concerned with the idea of self-determination as the true measure of mans moral character, and his key to triumph in the eternal struggle between good and evil that takes place within him. It particularly celebrates the power of human beings to determine their own destiny through exercising free will. This novel shows the unique development of human potential and gr ants a power of action and responsibility to man. One of the major questions being addressed in this paper is how the development of the characters in the East of Eden connect to the nature of good and evil. In the way that East of Eden depicts generations struggling with the choice between good and evil, it might be referencing a call to salvation. It comes as no surprise, that many say that the tale has close ties to the old testament story of Cain and Abel including how it mirrors Cains offering being rejected, Cain murdering his own brother, Cain becoming guilty and Cains punishment for his choice. Both the theme and structure of East of Eden come from biblical influence. A central biblical idea Steinbeck uses in East of Eden is the Hebrew word, Timshel, to demonstrates the idea of overcoming evil. Timshel is defined as the idea that human will is the strongest force on earth and can overcome anything. Steinbecks novel tries to escape evil and do good by focusing on the end of the story of Cain and Abel: thou mayest rule over sin (NRSV, Genesis. 4:7). Steinbeck sees this in the Bible as a key term for men to remember. East of Eden was different from many of Steinbeck earlier novels t hey never rose to such a height of glory in their view of what human begins can be. East of Eden reveals the source of human evil, and its forms. Nothing compared to the word Timshel that says, the way is open (Steinbeck 303). This idea was completely new to Steinbecks writing. First of all, nature is more influential to ones character because an individuals nature gives them the power of making choices as passed down from one generation to the next. When Steinbeck introduces the characters of Adam and Charles Trask, he describes the two boys. Adam is described as: Young Adam was always an obedient child. Something in him shrank from violence, from contention, from the silent shrieking tension that can rip a house. He contributed to the quiet he wished for by offering no violence, no contention, and to do this he had to retire into secretness, since there is some violence in everyone. He covered his life with a veil of vagueness, while behind his quite eyes a rich full life went on. this did not protect him from assault, but it allowed him an immunity (Steinbeck 20). Charles on the other hand, is strong and closer to the perfect child that his father would want: his half-brother Charles, only a little over a year younger, grew up with his father assertiveness. Charles was a natural athlete, with instinctive timing and coordination and the competitors will to win over others, which makes for success in the world (Steinbeck 20). The description of these two brothers is key because it plays a role in showing that physical and personal traits exist but are not the only things that shape the character. Further character development comes from the choices that they make between good and evil. Both of these men have the ability to choose between good and evil due to the fact that this is their nature. They have the same nature but not every mans nurture is the same. Since Adam Trask was the weak one, he always received more love and recognition from his father; whereas because Charles was the stronger brother, his father never felt the need to give him as much affection. Both these characters are developed by circumstances and relationships showing that mans nurture influences a piece of who they become. Although nurture has a slight influence on the way these characters develop, their nature forms a stronger foundation towards their overall character. As previously stated, nature has to do with genetics, but more importantly nature has to do with free will. In the old testament, the story of Adam and Eve begins with God giving humanity free will ,And the LORD God commanded the man, you may freely eat of every tree of the garden; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall, not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die (NRSV, Genesis. 2:16-17). Free will was given to man in the form of choosing between good and evil, which can be translated as mans nature. If Adam and Eve were to make the choice to go against the one restriction that God had for them, they would be bringing sin into the world. Adam and Eve did bring sin into the world by later eating of the tree of knowledge, thus man is faced with having to overcome sin. Mans nature comes from God, which means that God gives all man free will. This gives man the opportunity to use free will to overcome sin. Therefore, the key element to nature having more influence on an individuals character is free will. This being said man has control over whether or not he becomes good or evil because he has the ability to choose between good and evil. Man can never choose his circumstance, but he can choose how he is going to responds to things that are out of his control. He is able to do so because God has given every man free will. Even though Adam is favored over Charles, which leads to conflict between the two, both are able to make a choice on how to deal with the conflict. The same can be said for the conflict that Cain and Abel find themselves having to resolve. Each of these examples of character of dealing with conflict points back to the key concept of Timshel in Steinbecks novel. When facing adversity, a character will be developed by his choosing of good or evil.

Naturalistic Observation Free Essays

Naturalistic observation happens when they are studied naturally, which means the observer cannot control the conditions. The structured observations are set up to provoke certain behaviors of interest. These most of the time are not normal behaviors for the children who are being observed. We will write a custom essay sample on Naturalistic Observation or any similar topic only for you Order Now The benefits of using naturalistic observation is the fact that there are no factors that are making the child act different. This could limit though the responses that you get from the child because they don’t know what you are doing, and they may make themselves act a little different because they are being observed. I believe that using naturalistic observation is a good way because you can see naturally how the child is and what they do without any directions or orders. The benefits of using structured observations are you asking the children questions or giving them tasks and kind of being prepared for what they may do. This helps you compare data of children of the same age on what they would do. Structured observation This method had limits because the children aren’t acting as they would naturally, yes, they have the freedom to answer the questions to their desire or perform the task as they wish, but that isn’t how the child is naturally. This type of observation is kind of controlled observation, which could make the child feel more nervous than just getting observed. The observation style that I agree with is the naturalistic observation. I say this because you get to see how the child is naturally, without any limitations. This could help you compare the acts of children with disabilities versus the children without disabilities. Using naturalistic observation, it allows you to see the true actions and emotions of the child because you don’t have any restraints or objectives of the observation. How to cite Naturalistic Observation, Essays Naturalistic Observation Free Essays Naturalistic observation is considered as one of the basic methods in psychological research and study. This fundamental research methodology is known to divulge and aid the psychologist in his or her critical analysis of the human behavior and characteristics while in socially acceptable public domain in his or her course of interacting with other individuals in their aspect of addressing their sociological needs. In this aspect of human interaction, psychologist try to significantly analyze the human nature as shown by their actions both involving the verbal and non-verbal communication style and how individuals manifest their motives while adhering to the social values and cultures pertaining to public communication. We will write a custom essay sample on Naturalistic Observation or any similar topic only for you Order Now Naturalistic observation is commonly an actual observation of subjects mainly while they are in their course of social interaction specifically while they are in the public place. In the course of implementing this method, the researcher must also observe social values and cultural manners thus preventing any offensive act during the observation. In addition, the concept of personal privacy and inappropriate intrusion should also be constantly observed while the researcher is observing the subjects. All of these limitations must be implemented while the researcher observed the subjects in an isolated nature keeping his or her presence unnoticed and ideally absent to the personal space of the subject during their interaction. The only aspect to be focused on in this project is the psychological behavior of the subject as manifested by their very intricate details such as gestures, voice, reaction, facial expression and impression and others. Project: Naturalistic Observation In this aspect of applying the method of naturalistic observation during an actual psychological study, this author conducted a personal project using the said methodology. In this study, the researcher particularly this author will try to support the psychological hypothesis postulated by Aronson (et al, 2004) and Lesko (2000) regarding the psychological behavior and actions of individuals during an actual social interaction. This hypothesis will significantly govern the psychological observation project and will guide the researcher in establishing an interactional pattern as observed through the subjects. In this observation, the researcher presumptively hypothesized that the dominant speaker in the first part of the conversation will likely speak more frequently in the later part of the conversation. The chosen subjects are a man and a woman both Caucasians who are dining in a restaurant and are observably conversing with each other regarding a specific matter which both of them can relate. It is very apparent from the observable verbal and non-verbal aspect of their communication that the topic they are conversing is very critical as they both stresses their own involvement and awareness to it. Verbal recording is not very likely in this situation as an attempt to push this is prevented by the environment and the situation at hand however, few notes of recorded key words denotes that they are talking about a legal and ethical issue in their work environment. Words mentioned such as â€Å"management†, â€Å"chief-of-executives†, â€Å"a settlement bargain† and â€Å"what the labor union ought to do† will denote that they are both involve in the same job and in the same issue they are both probably working with. This will suggests that the situation is likely an informal meeting between the two, possible from different party, to discuss some important details regarding their business issue or a settlement for the resolution of their topic. This is established to be informal by the researcher as suggested by their attire as they are into casual wear. In non-verbal observation, the actions and gestures of the subjects will denote that they are with a professional background as their etiquettes and manners are significantly refined for the matter (Aronson et al, 2004; Lesko, 2000). In addition, their gesture mainly the speaker, at their specific chances, will suggests a clear and direct emphasis on his or her point thus suggesting that their topic is indeed of high importance (Lesko, 2000). This concept is further followed with the high intention of the other to listen carefully and then reply with his or her personal opinion on the matter with a language that is concise and direct to the point. The observed intonations and voice volume is noticeably well modulated suggesting that both of the subjects as well versed in the field of the topic and that they are cautious of offending the other. With critical and empirical observation of the subjects, this researcher has noted that the man seems to be speaking more frequently while the woman speaks primarily in response to the man’s idea. This factor suggests that the man has the part of proposal or he is the one with the main intention for the meeting, which is likely established by him. The verbal aspect of the woman can thus be regarded to be as a commentary or a supplementary mean in this conversation making her the character that the proposal is focused with. In the aspect of considering the hypothesis that is previously stated, the man is postulated to speak more frequently in the following period. And in the observed subjects, the man is indeed noted to have spoken more frequently than the woman, which establishes the hypothesized interactional pattern in the social behavior of the observed individuals. Conclusion As observed in the conducted naturalistic observation, it has been determined by this author that social interaction of individuals are indeed influenced by their natural nature and motives manifesting through the creation of the dominant speaker and the other being the receiver. The person who has the greater aim and intention in each social interaction who is more likely than one who established the said meeting has the greater possibility of becoming the main speaker in the conversation. On the other hand, the other party becomes the main receiver as his or her speech becomes supplementary or commentary with that of the other. Thus, in social interaction, it is very likely that one party manifest as the dominant side to guide and focus the conversation as he or she has the greater intention in the said interaction. Bibliography Aronson, E. Wilson T. D. Akert R. M. (2004). Social Psychology. Prentice Hall, NY, USA. 5th Edition. Lesko, W. A. (2000). Readings in Social Psychology: General, Classic and Contemporary Selections. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, USA. 5th Edition. How to cite Naturalistic Observation, Essays

Case Study about the Biggest Bankruptcy Case in Australia

Question: Case study about the biggest bankruptcy case in Australia. Answer: Introduction The study is a detailed analysis of a case study related to bankruptcy in U.S.A. The analysis of the case study seeks to identify the inherent problems in the organization and what lead to the downfall of the organization. It will explain the events in the case study with the use of different theories on leadership. It will analyze those theories and ideas to find solutions to the problem identified in the case study. Based on the issues identified, effective solutions will be provided to improve similar kind of situations in the organization. It will recommend the best solution available for the problem and give detailed information on how specific solutions need to be implemented to bring the change in the organization. It will also identify types of unethical behavior demonstrated in the case study and what intervention needs to be done minimize this kind of behavior in an organization. Identifying problems from case study The case study is about the biggest bankruptcy case in Australia. It is about US Company Enron formed by the merger of natural gas pipeline companies Houston Natural Gas and Internorth in 1986. In 15 years time span the company expanded to other products like natural gas, electricity, and communication. The company's downfall became evident from the third quarter of 2001. During that period, the stock market collapsed all of a sudden. Enron could not make new borrowings, and eventually, they ran out of cash. This leads to loss of confidence in leaders of Enron. Though their assets and earnings showed a satisfactory progress of the company but it was just an illusion. Due to partnership and financial deal with the different company, they were in a huge burden of debt. They created false earnings, avoided taxes and hide losses. Another major problem was a conflict of interest. The employees were not united for common objectives. At Enron, the employee appraisal was based on profit gene rated by the employee but not on delivering core values of the organization. There were also unethical practices in the organization. The proof was the case of California was they used unethical means to generate extra profits. They were involved in just raising the companies to share and undermined ethical issues in practice. Even after the retirement of Enron's CEO Jeff Skilling, Ken Lay also followed his steps. They continued to buy more shares and ultimately failed completely and became bankrupt. Board of Directors should monitor unethical behavior in an organization, but they were Enron's CEO themselves were into unethical practice. There was no proper collaboration between employees, and the Directors did not brief on partnerships. Many were sued in the company for insider trading. Though Enron's values were "Respect, Integrity, Communication, and Excellence", but it was not followed in reality. Therefore, major problem analyzed was the conflict of interest (Individualism), lack of borrowings, massive debts and unrestrained pursuit of profit. The risk-t aking a culture of Enron further promoted unethical practices (Leonidou et al., 2013). Explanation of case studies by theories on leadership The action of CEOs of Enron will be identified by relevant theories on leadership. One of them is the Trait theory. This theory suggests that characteristics of a person make them a good leader. Common traits include empathy, integrity, good decision making skills, etc. This believes influences one's action. But Enron failed because both CEOs Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay were lacking in this regard. Though they were involved in creating more profits and earnings, but they did not pay heed to unethical means of achieving it (Colbert et al., 2012). Another theory is the behavioral theory of leadership. It explains the involvement of leaders in team and organization development. Kurt Lewin developed this theory, and he identifies three types of leaders- autocratic, democratic and Laissez-faire leaders. According to the case study, it can be analyzed that the Board of Directors at Enron were autocratic leaders. They did not consult team, there was no briefing on new development or partnerships, and they did not encourage new input from employees. They were just in the pursuit of profit irrespective of unethical means (Chemers 2014). Affect of leadership on culture Leaders can influence organization both positively and negatively. Leaders at Enron had risk taking a culture. They even paid a bonus to employees who manipulated profit estimates. So they encouraged all sorts of unethical behavior in the organization ultimately leading to its downfall. Culture in an organization is created by actions of leaders, focus of leaders, how they reward or penalize employees and their attention to resource development in the organization. Good leaders focus on the above points to nurture and develop the organization culture. They help in molding and shaping the culture of the organization. They act as role models whose actions employees try to emulate. They are the reason for the long-term effectiveness of the organization. They set up an environment within which each team members strive and work together for the excellence of the organization (Klein et al., 2013). Suggest solutions to the problem Enron was dealing with major issues like the conflict of interest, unethical means of business, huge debt, lack of effective leaders, bankruptcy situation and unfair ways of earning profits. This section suggests some solutions to the suggested problems identified in the case study. One of the biggest problems was the error of action of leaders at Enron. They had poor leadership skills, and they could not manage a team according to company's core values. Their focus was only on generating profits, no matter it comes by what means. Such action is encouraged in the organization only because of faulty leaders. This problem can be solved only if leaders take the initiative to improve situations. Leaders may be affected by factors which are beyond the workplace culture. At Enron, they were facing financial problems due to the sudden collapse of the stock exchange. This kind of situations distracts the focus of leaders. So they could have addressed problems in organization and took logical steps to solve it with team members effort. Poor leadership has an impact on overall turnover, employee satisfaction, productivity and culture of the organization. If leader accepted the responsibility for the problem and spent their time on reviving and inspiring workplace, the maj or problems can be solved. Strategic leadership gives clarity of vision and provides a chance for the team members to pursue it in an ethical manner. They provide tools and resources for avoiding obstacles in the work environment (Schoemaker et al., 2013). Another major problem with Enron was an accumulation of huge debt ultimately leading to bankruptcy. Organizations can effectively deal with such situation if they perceive things beforehand. The first step towards dealing with such situation is to do a realistic assessment of companys expenditure and profit. In the case of a financial problem, one can contact creditors and make the modified payments plan that reduces their burden of debts. Any company must have debt management plan in place to better deal with such situations. So Companies should analyze financial situations from the beginning and manage expenditures to avoid accumulation of debts in future. Taking the right amount of debt and at the right time also help in making situations better. Huge debts could be managed by making better borrowing decision earlier. But once it is too late for retroactive financial analysis, there are only two options left. One is to try to save the problem by settling accounts and an exit strat egy that minimizes financial risk. The first option can be executed by cutting cost, contacting employers to improve business model and contacting creditors for lowering interest rates or restructuring payment options. The loan could be consolidated by one payment option which reduces monthly cost and does not put debt burden. The last and the final route is filing for bankruptcy. Though it requires services of a bankruptcy attorney, it is a better option for reducing the debt burden. If any business has assets lesser than debts, bankruptcy allows to pay only the value of assets and not the entire amount (Segal, 2013). Another solution is required for unethical behavior in organizations. If this kind of issues is not addressed, it will lead to serious consequences, and ultimately the organization will suffer for it. There were several unethical practices at Enron such as manipulation of profits for employees, unethical pursuits for profit, etc. A human resource manager could play a role in tackling in unethical issues. To actively address unethical behavior at work, Company's direct can take steps like creating a strict code of ethics in the organization. It establishes those values which are critical for particular business and creates a framework of objectives for the workplace. Such framework helps employees to understand the boundaries within which they have to work. The ethical vision of the company should be communicated to each employee in the form of a broadly written statement. There should be a clear protocol for reporting unethical behavior in the workplace. It could be in the form of me eting with team manager or supervisor. Managers can play a role in helping employees identify and handle ethics violation. New employees could be given ethics training to increase the effectiveness of ethical code. Creating a better and ethical workplace will ultimately lead to improved work process, happier environment and success of business (Jacobs et al., 2014). Recommendation A lot of have been said about the possible solutions to the problem identified in the case study. Another recommendation is related to the effort of team members. Companies prosper due to good team management, and it may also collapse due to the disordered and chaotic team. So team development could be a significant intervention to solve the problem. Improvement in this section will help in getting work done efficiently, and the competent team can also handle all hurdles or obstacle in business (Fransen et al., 2013). Ways of implementation Effective team and good leadership skill is the key to success in the workplace. Building a successful team also depend on the leadership. These approaches could be taken by Enron to improve their problems in the workplace. The following are the ways for team development and accessing the sustainability of team in organization: Clarity about work: The leader must access how well they are accepted by their team members and evaluate areas where they can improve. A leader must ensure that they modify approaches to strengthen the team and lead them to achieve new heights. Making each member aware about the accuracy and clarity of task is important in this regard. Getting to know each member of the teams: It is important for leaders to know the strength and weakness of each team members. It encourages better cooperation in work. Leaders can give the particular task to skillful members and provide training to those members who are lacking in some specific aspects of work. Great leaders know exactly which members to utilize in the urgency of the task and handling tricky situations. Defining clear goal and responsibilities: Once leaders recognize the fundamental skills of each team member, their next task is to define role and responsibilities clearly to each one of them. Each team member is dependent on each other. Talent in the individual should be identified not just by the ability to perform a task but also by checking whether they will fit into organization culture or not. Being proactive with feedback: Getting regular reviews and feedback about teams performance helps a team to improve and develop each day. It will help a team to stay on the right track. One should not give feedback only when the problem arises. Constant and proactive feedback is the key to the success of a team and organization (Broadbent 2013). Conclusion From the analysis of case study about Enron Company, it can be concluded that most organization suffers from similar problems. Problems like financial losses and unethical behavior are common in all organization. But what distinguishes a successful organization from their opposite counterpart is the role of leaders. Effective leaders take the organization forward. But leaders at Enron were more involved in profitable pursuits, but they forgot about ethical issues and core values of the company in their quest for unfair means of money. So the report analyzed the specific problems in the company and suggested relevant solutions to those problems. It explained several theories on leadership style. Finally, it gave ways of effectively implementing a solution to the problem. Reference Broadbent, M. (2013). Focus early on team member capability.Government News,33(2), 12. Chemers, M. (2014).An integrative theory of leadership. Psychology Press. Colbert, A. E., Judge, T. A., Choi, D., Wang, G. (2012). Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer ratings of personality: The mediating role of contributions to group success.The Leadership Quarterly,23(4), 670-685. Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL.Educational psychologist,48(1), 9-24. Jacobs, G., Belschak, F. D., Den Hartog, D. N. (2014). (Un) ethical behavior and performance appraisal: the role of affect, support, and organizational justice.Journal of business ethics,121(1), 63-76. Klein, A. S., Wallis, J., Cooke, R. A. (2013). The impact of leadership styles on organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An empirical study.Journal of Management Organization,19(03), 241-254. Leonidou, C. N., Leonidou, L. C., Coudounaris, D. N., Hultman, M. (2013). Value differences as determinants of importers perceptions of exporters unethical behavior: The impact on relationship quality and performance.International Business Review,22(1), 156-173. Schoemaker, P. J., Krupp, S., Howland, S. (2013). Strategic leadership: The essential skills.Harvard business review,91(1), 131-134. Segal, D. (2013). High debt and falling demand trap new vets.New York Times,23.